I was graciously invited to guest speak to Indian undergraduate students in a survey of sociology course. They asked that I speak of the social structure of the United States. We discussed the contributions of the famous American sociologist C. W. Mills, specifically the "sociological imagination." His famous proposition is how "personal troubles relate to public issues" arguing that the crux of sociology lies at the intersection of individual biography and public history. I gave a quick little research project I did a few years back where former Vice President Richard Cheney's personal decisions to reenroll in college, marry and have children coincides perfectly with the history and policies of the U.S. military draft during the Vietnam conflict. They seemed to get a kick out of that but also perplexed as to how someone who got five draft deferments managed to be the principle architect of the War in Iraq.
After that I used the "troubles and issues" concept to compare and contrast Indian and U.S, society. We had a very spirited debate and discussion of marriage and divorce (almost nonexistent in India) patterns between our two cultures. Most Indians (in this particular class and in general) tend to think arranged marriages are "better" and the high divorce rate in the US is an indicator of a flawed system of courtship and weak families. The American mating dance of serial monogamy and successive divorces horrifies many Indians in the same way arranged marriages horrifies many Americans. I can totally understand the value and utility of an arranged marriage, and I'm pretty open about all styles of courtship and types of relationships around the world, but I couldn't help but to take the unpopular side (in this context) to provoke debate. In all, it was a very lighthearted discussion filled with jokes and laughter about both Indians and Americans. Once again, I was outnumbered by the women (and I admit, ultimately outflanked), who overwhelmingly spoke in favor of the Indian family system. From what I understand, young women in India are in a bit of a "double bind" (to borrow the words of Arlie Hochshild) concerning their family roles as their husbands or potential husbands expect them to be "modern" "hip" and "original" while expecting them to fulfill traditional roles in the house and so on. We also had a more serious discussion of resource depletion and waste of energy in "developed" countries.
Indian students have a much more reverent and respectful demeanor toward professors (and scientists), like in Korea professors are thought of as "nation builders" here and are probably more prestigious than surgeons (but not as prestigious as call center workers). Students rise when I enter the classroom and do not leave until the professor has left. I have to admit I'm a little uncomfortable with the rising and usually motion for them to sit as soon as they stand up (I am pretty informal even by U.S. West Coast standards of higher ed.). That said, they have no problem whatsoever arguing with the professor, and I like that. Mills would certainly approve.
I noticed some students were entering the class late, I was later told that they changed the classroom to the only air conditioned room they have in the building. I suspect someone told them about my sweating problem and general intolerance toward heat. I was invited back to this particular class immediately and will be happy to do it again.
I also spoke the a class of about 16 graduate students. I had not been as prepared as I was anticipating they would have some things to say, but it was more difficult to get them to speak up than I thought. All but one of them were women. I felt bad because the one man was a Buddhist monk from the south of Cambodia and I immediately began asking him all kinds of enthusiastic questions (I really like his region of the world). I hope it didn't make the others feel excluded. To paraphrase "Borat" more "cultural learnings to make US and A an even more glorious of a nation."